Clients who pay for the construction of new edifices or major renovations of existing ones generally expect them to be in pristine condition when they assume tenancy. Contractors and leaders running construction companies typically maintain high standards to ensure that their clients feel satisfied with the outcome of every project.
Unfortunately, sometimes clients try to blame the people who built a home for issues with it. For example, homeowners might claim that mold development inside a property is a construction defect. Is there any merit to that claim?
Mold growth is a common issue
Florida sees more precipitation than many other states. Regular rain can create many opportunities for water to enter a building or construction site. Construction companies and professionals typically need to follow industry standards for waterproofing and securing construction sites during rainstorms and in between workdays.
Issues ranging from the improper sealing of windows and doors to problems with the plumbing could substantiate a client’s claims that the mold growing in the home is a construction defect. Even the way that they store materials after their delivery to the job site could contribute to mold growth later.
Records of appropriate attempts to prevent water incursion can play a critical role in a company’s response to a construction defect lawsuit. The more evidence there is of appropriate construction practices and the more time that has passed since the completion of work, the better the chances of the company beating a construction defect claim brought because of mold development inside the building.
Getting support as early as possible when facing construction defect litigation can help professionals and business owners avoid expensive, reputation-damaging civil court losses.